The FCA and PRA are reviewing mortgage affordability rules introduced after the 2008–2009 credit crunch.
The aim: improve access to mortgages, especially for first‑time buyers, while maintaining responsible lending.
Following the Mortgage Market Review (MMR) in 2014, lenders were required to:
These rules were designed to prevent a repeat of the “toxic debt” era.
✔ Centralised Stress Test
Replace lender‑specific stress tests with a single FCA‑set stress model.
✔ Remove +3% Stress Test on 5‑Year Fixes
The current +3% uplift is seen as overly restrictive.
✔ Remove Minimum 1% Stress Margin
Replace with a centralised margin, giving lenders flexibility without creating market distortions.
✔ Consider Rental Payment History
The FCA proposes requiring lenders to factor in consistent rent payments as evidence of affordability.
We say: “It is crazy to think that a borrower may have been paying £1,000 pm in rent … but then gets turned down for a mortgage costing £900pm.”
Post‑crisis, lenders were restricted to:
This prevented excessive high‑risk lending.
The cap is shifting from 15% of new lending to 15% of the lender’s total mortgage book.
Why this matters
New flexibility
A small lender could now offer up to 15% of its entire book as high‑LTI — potentially 100+ loans.
“This will allow more lenders to offer more ‘high LTI’ loans… and may encourage smaller lenders to enter the market.”
What is changing with FCA mortgage stress tests?
The FCA proposes removing the +3% stress test on 5‑year fixes, removing minimum 1% stress margins, and introducing a centralised stress model.
Yes — the FCA is considering requiring lenders to factor in consistent rent payments as evidence of affordability.
The cap is shifting from 15% of new lending to 15% of the total mortgage book, allowing more high‑LTI lending.
Potentially. More flexibility could increase lending volumes, but also risk a return to high‑risk borrowing if not managed carefully.
No. Suitability and affordability assessments remain mandatory.