
Definition of Financial Advice Changing.
Following the Financial Advice Market Review (FAMR), a review to assess how to make it easier for the consumer to access financial advice as well as encouraging financial advisers to offer advice in markets and areas that they would not normally do so because of red tape or liability or lack of profitability, the Treasury has a yesterday launched a consultation into changing the definition of financial advice.
The problem with financial advice is that there is no statutory limitation for liability. For most industries in the United Kingdom consumers can claim for negligence or compensation or faulty goods or workmanship within six years. However, for financial advice there is an open ended liability. In short, the financial adviser is liable for life. This is why financial advice is not cheap and why many consumers are not able to access high-quality advice when needed due to the cost of the advice or a lack of availability of financial advisers in any particular field. This is commonly known as the "advice gap" and the government is trying to close this gap to ensure that all consumers have access to professional advice or guidance when needed.
Current solution
Consumers can currently access only regulated financial advice or seek guidance only which does not constitute advice.
Guidance Problem
The problem being that guidance is usually not offered by qualified financial advisers and it is merely generic guidance. Guidance means it cannot be personalised to your own specific needs or requirements and it certainly cannot even mention the name of a regulated financial product let alone naming a specific pension or investment company. For example:
This is all about costs and liability. A financial adviser very easily becomes liable for what they say or write down and as a result they charge for their expertise.
Two Definitions of Financial Advice
The difficulty for the financial industry and in particular financial advisers is that there are two definitions as to what constitutes financial advice:
In short, financial advisers cannot even mention a product without it being required to be regulated.
The Treasury's Proposal
The Treasury is suggesting that the UK uses the MiFID only definition so that non-regulated firms can offer lower cost guidance services and still mention specific products, without any personal recommendation, to take a particular course of action.
Comment
It makes total sense for there to be a requirement to be regulated only if you are making personal recommendations. If the Treasury does pursue this route we will be able to offer guidance services at a fraction of the cost of fully regulated financial advice. Consumers will have greater choice and greater access to help with their finances although we suggest that there should be a minimum qualification level for those that offer guidance only such as the Chartered Insurance Institutes eight paper Financial Planning Certificate (equivalent to an NVQ level X, or A-level).